• Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Does Google use click data to rank pages?

Posted by on in Industry News
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1101
  • 2 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Yesterday week I was watching a Hangout with (among others) Andrey Lipattsev, Search Quality Senior Strategist at Google. At one point Rand, Eric and Ammon were talking to him about some experiences they'd tested with click data, and asked if indeed Google was using it in some form.

b2ap3_thumbnail_Google-click-data.jpg

Long story short, Andrey couldn't really confirm nor deny the specific instances the boys mentioned, without more information. He did however imply that in some instances (shorter temporal ones) there could indeed be some ranking benefits from said signals.

That of course is interesting as Googlers have generally distanced themselves from that as being too noisy and spam-able. I myself have had that reply in the past when talking with former web spam team head, Matt Cutts.

And as recently as last summer, Google's Gary Illyes said that they use them for “evaluation and for experimentation” not for ranking.

Implicit User Feedback

Regardless of what you want to believe, I felt it worth getting into, if only to add to your education as a search geek. These kinds of signals are what is known as implicit user feedback. To get a sense of what types of signals can fall under that umbrella, consider;

  • Query history (search history)
  • SERP interaction (clicks, query revisions, selections and bounce rates)
  • User document behaviour (time on page/site, scrolling behaviour);
  • Surfing habits (frequency and time of day)
  • Interactions with advertising
  • Demographic and geographic
  • Data from different application (application focus — IM, email, reader);
  • Closing a window.

This is something that I last wrote about back in 2011 in a post on personalization and user behaviour. At that time I did muse that it “might” make some sense in a personalized environment, not the core search setting.

Patents of interest

Next, let's look at some of the patents on the topic. As recently as this past January (2016) Google was awarded a patent on implicit user feedback with;

Modifying search result ranking based on implicit user feedback (filed in 2013).

Which was a re-filing of the same patent that was awarded back in 2014 as well (filed in 2006). It is important to note that this approach was kicking around Google a decade ago. This is not exactly fresh.

This one involves;

“... the first number corresponding to longer views of the document result, and the second number corresponding to at least shorter views of the document result; and outputting the measure of relevance to a ranking engine for ranking of search results, including the document result, for a new search corresponding to the search query.

In short... bounce rates (often referred to as pogo-sticking). The reason that this type of click-data can be noisy is that given the context of a query, a shorter view isn't always a bad thing. Consider price comparisons etc.

One of the authors of that one, was also involved in;

Modifying search result ranking based on implicit user feedback and a model of presentation bias

And again, not new as it was filed in 2007, though awarded in 2015. Once more, not exactly a fresh idea, which we can infer could be outdated and merely IP protectionism. In this case, they're looking at click-data in context of selections (click bias) and selection history (bias) to refine rankings of the documents returned for a query.

Another one, filed in 2007, awarded in 2015 (covered by Bill Slawski here) is;
Modifying search result ranking based on a temporal element of user feedback

Again, more click data... read Bill's post for more on that one.

Ultimately, I can show you another 1/2 dozen or so patents relating to implicit user feedback. And yes, there has certainly been some interest over the years, but not a lot of them were actually filed over the last 5 years or so. Take that for what you will.

At the end of the day

I really wouldn't start to use clicks as an effective long-term SEO strategy. Even the testing the boys had done only had a short term benefit. It could be that implicit user feedback only affects temporal spaces that are prone to the QDF.

As always, we don't really know.

We have to consider the value. Does the noisy potential and ability to spam these signals outweigh the benefit to Google? It's possible. Given the long history of detecting various forms of click-spam, it seems to me the noise factor would be the more important one. Is the signal clean enough to offer enough benefit?

We can also consider that it could be used in limited query spaces, temporal natures or even personalized settings.

At the very least it seems the boys are on to “something” as intimated by Andrey in the Hangout in question. Exactly what though, is still unknown.

Hi my name is Dave and I, am an algo-holic


I am an avid search geek that spends most of his time reading about and playing with search engines. My main passion has always been about the technical side of things from a strong perspective rooted in IR and related technologies.


Also hook up via

Comments

  • Guest
    Frank Watson Thursday, 24 March 2016

    Clicks can have a very temporal impact on rankings - at least 18 months ago - recently it does not seem to have the same impact - and I have tested this and seen the results

  • David Harry
    David Harry Thursday, 24 March 2016

    That's kinda what I was starting to think Frank... that the effects they were seeing are somewhat QDF related. We shall see what happens when Rand runs his next "test". And really, if it wasn't before, it's certainly on the radar now with Google after that session lol.

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 24 November 2017

Search

Follow Us

Recent Comments

#logicbombs
Steve
That's kinda what I was starting to think Frank... that the effects they were seeing are somewhat QD...
Clicks can have a very temporal impact on rankings - at least 18 months ago - recently it does not s...
Frank Watson
I'm still listening to the podcast. I'm adding schema to PDP pages to keep Google Merchant Center p...
Anne Haynes
I listened to the disavow file podcast today. Even without automated bad link tools, you can still s...
Anne Haynes
Go to top