• Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Google RankBrain SEO doesn't exist: here's why

Posted by on in General SEO
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 785
  • 1 Comment
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

Given the amount of apparent confusion around how it will affect your marketing efforts, we felt it was time to dive into what it means to you.

RankBrain1.jpg

Connecting the dots

What I do think is important is that we're seeing a definitive moment in where search is probably going in the future. Give we have a Google Hangout on this topic today, I felt one more post was in order.

Again, I get the sense that these are early days for the associated elements that seem to be part of this current chain in the evolution of how Google works. We know that they are using the machine learning parts in other areas such as spam detection already. So that part of this puzzle, isn't limited to just RankBrain.

We also know that the holy grail is voice search (known as conversational search within Google). I can't help but think that RankBrain, in essence at least, is part of moving towards that direction I've added a video at the end for more on conversational search.

If you'd like to learn more about the shift, here are some elements worth considering;

For me it's important to consider that what RankBrain is today, is likely not where it will end up. The starting point of affecting ambiguous queries, is seemingly somewhere Google can implement the technology and move from there into other areas of search.

It will certainly be far more ubiquitous down the road in voice search, and in a larger implementations within standard text search.

 

How does RankBrain affect Rankings?

That's the question that seems to be on a lot of folks minds in the SEO world. From what we do know so far, it doesn't directly affect rankings. That is to say that it isn't a set of scoring mechanisms itself.

Google has stated that,

RankBrain is one of the ‘hundreds’ of signals that go into an algorithm that determines what results appear on a Google search page and where they are ranked,”.

That's the interesting part. How it's affecting rankings is that it essentially re-writes the query in a sense, which in turn is going to change what is served back in the results.

As such, in that sense, it is certainly affecting rankings, without being a direct scoring element (such as PageRank). It is probably something I'd consider more of a boosting/dampening signal. Most certainly, at this point, RankBrain isn't evaluating things on-page. Not so say that this won't change and we could see a direct ranking factor at some point. For the moment, this is more about query classification.

It's also probably worth noting that RankBrain is NOT being used real-time. It is working offline and then tested for quality, prior to the data push being rolled out.


How will it affect your search marketing efforts?

And so, back to the original question.

When asked on a recent podcast interview; “.. how should SEOs explain RankBrain to their boss or client?” - I answered, “Don't?”.

That means you (as a marketer) probably don't need to try and “optimize” for RankBrain. This is more about improving search quality for Google.

This won't really have a direct affect on how we do things. It's not really something we can optimize for per se. Which is what someone asking that question, really wants to know. I would suggest re-directing them into a different thought pattern;

Contextually solid content - ensure that the content you're producing is solidified around concepts, entities and the meanings on the page. Get past the tactic of stuffing desired terms on a page and move towards concepts, phrases, entities and their relations. This is important for far more than RankBrain.

Don't discount conversational search – while it's not currently an overly important part of SEO, we want to understand that one of the most important areas in the near future is going to be voice search. You are going to want to ensure you understand it well and account for where we're headed.

Understanding how RankBrain fits into the evolution of search is the real take-away here. It's not about how we can adapt to it nor how it's going to affect rankings and traffic (in the short term).


What is RankBrain?

There's already been a ton of coverage on this, some of it way off-base and/or click-baity, and some other posts are far closer to truly understanding where this is headed. I think Danny's original post (last fall) is certainly one of the better ones to use as a starting point.

Ultimately, RankBrain can help Google better understand words and how they relate to each other. Some of the core elements take semantic analysis to a new level by turning words into vectors, instead of the more traditional word and phrase relation approaches.

Here's at some simple word vector examples;

King – man + woman = Queen

King relates to prince
Queen relates to princess
Given that King relates to Queen,
King can also relate to princess.

The system is looking for word relations and (within a vector graph) how closely related they actually are. By understanding how these words relate, they can better understand what a given query might be looking for.

Here's an output from a word vector neural net visualization tool;

sel-RB-image1.jpg

The red neural paths being the strongest relation, to the blue ones, which are the weakest.

The reason that they're doing this, instead of traditional semantic analysis, is that the vector approach lends itself to machine learning and ultimately, an artificial intelligence approach.

Now, from what we know, it's only primarily affecting some 15% of queries (but being run across the entire system). And those queries, are the more ambiguous and long tail ones that Google had problems truly understanding in the past.

 

Some videos worth watching;

The Future of search (SMX 2016);

Deep Learning; Word2Vec

Word Embedding Explained and Visualized


Hi my name is Dave and I, am an algo-holic


I am an avid search geek that spends most of his time reading about and playing with search engines. My main passion has always been about the technical side of things from a strong perspective rooted in IR and related technologies.


Also hook up via

Comments

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 24 March 2017

Search

Follow Us

Recent Comments

#logicbombs
Steve
That's kinda what I was starting to think Frank... that the effects they were seeing are somewhat QD...
Clicks can have a very temporal impact on rankings - at least 18 months ago - recently it does not s...
Frank Watson
I'm still listening to the podcast. I'm adding schema to PDP pages to keep Google Merchant Center p...
Anne Haynes
I listened to the disavow file podcast today. Even without automated bad link tools, you can still s...
Anne Haynes
Go to top